Subscribe to Wine Camp

Add to Google

 
Subscribe in a reader

Enter your email address:

Delivered by FeedBurner


Wine Camp: Publishing online since 2003
Nominated as “Best Wine Blog” by Saveur Magazine

Named one of the top
Wine Blog authors by
Food and Wine Magazine

Top Ranked on the AlaWine
100 Top Wine Blogs
Listed on All Top Wine Blogs
Ranked in the world’s top 15 wine sites by Cellarer.com

finalistlogo.jpg
Winner “Best Jazz Writing on a Wine Blog”
Add to Technorati Favorites Btn_wht_122x44

My Links

Cornerstone Cellars's Facebook profile

Craig Camp's Facebook profile
View Craig Camp's profile on LinkedIn

Share on Facebook


Blog directory

Powered by Squarespace
Current Topics
Great Places to Buy Wines With a Terroir-ist Twist
Login
« Italy Guarantees Brunello | Main | Old vs. New: Is there a difference? »
Monday
Jul072008

Corks Screwed

stelvin.jpgScrewcaps are best: Decanter verdict - decanter.com

The normally conservative Decanter has jumped into the closure controversy with both feet. In an upcoming article “50 Reasons to Love Screwcaps” some of Decanter’s big guns, including Steven Spurrier have thrown their unequivocal support behind screwcaps. Spurrier says, “the Stelvin is one of the best things to have happened to wine in my lifetime.” If you follow the link above you’ll find not all Decanter readers agree.

In a recent post I commented on the new book by George Taber, Put A Cork In It, which I feel is the best research out there on the topic of wine closures. Taber’s conclusion was more-or-less it depends on the wine going into the bottle and that each of the closures currently in general use have their issues and unknowns. Everyone seems to agree that for wines destined to be consumed young and fresh that screwcaps are the best, which is a position that I fully concur with. As this category of wine probably accounts for over 95% of the wine made in the world it would seem to make this debate somewhat moot. Such wines should be in screwcaps.

However, for that five or so percent of wines from vineyards and winemakers that are made for aging the answer is not so clear. I have a feeling that eventually alternative closures will overtake this category too as industry leaders like Plumpjack prove their reliability and their capability for wines aged under screwcap to mature into wines as great as those aged under cork.

I admit I love screwcaps and have found the wines finished with them brighter and fresher than most cork finished wines. This is amplified with high acid white wines and riesling in particular seems to thrive under them. The big issue with screwcaps remains the potential of reduction developing in wines sealed with them, but winemakers have quickly dealt with this issue and should know how to prevent it. Of course, knowledge is not always used equally by all wineries, but you can apply this same argument to those using corks.

I can understand why a great Bordeaux chateau or Napa Valley Cabernet Sauvignon producer may want to wait before making the leap, but if you’re making Beaujolais Villages, Montepulciano d’Abruzzo, Albarino, California Sauvignon Blanc or any other wine likely to be consumed within a year or two of bottling it’s time to get your cork out of your neck.

EmailEmail Article to Friend

Reader Comments (7)

I've heard that Gaja keeps all of his library wines in Stelvin closures (who cares? overpriced overdone wines you say,maybe but it still lends weight to the argument). Anyone have confirmation/repudiation of this? It seems that the Austrians are really on top of the screwcap game as well as ranking high in natural and biodynamic viticulture. Maybe they're a good future map to look at and while you're there pop a Mozart ball for me.
July 8, 2008 | Unregistered CommenterBeau Rapier
what about man made corks? are there issues with them as well? The ones I have seen appear to function much like natural cork with out the side effects of bacterial growth? wondering....
July 8, 2008 | Unregistered CommenterKVolk
It was my understanding that Gaja kept his personal library under crown caps, which may be the best closure of all, but they have been totally rejected by consumers.
July 8, 2008 | Registered CommenterCraig Camp
KVolk - Plastic corks have had so many problems that most producers are abandoning them. There have been wines tainted by flavors from the materials, premature oxidation and problems removing them. Today's products have improved, but so have screwcaps.
July 8, 2008 | Registered CommenterCraig Camp
I opened the Plumpjack site, only to be disappointed in not finding any verification that screw caps allow aging of the wine equivalent to that of cork. Please refer me to a site that provides/documents such verification.
invinoveritas 9 July 2008
July 9, 2008 | Unregistered CommenterB. Dorsk
OK, but first you have to show me a site that "verifies" that corks are better than screwcaps.

We have to remember we are talking about taste here, something not absolutely provable. Thirty years ago loads of brett were acceptable and almost the norm for some regions (Chateauneuf comes to mind) and today those wines would be unsalable. Our tastes have evolved with winemaking technology and knowledge.What is considered great wine changes with time.

It is my opinion that wines will age as well under screwcap, but more slowly. While that's great for pinot noir, it's not so great for nebbiolo or cabernet.
July 9, 2008 | Unregistered CommenterCraig Camp
B. Dorsk,

You may find this article of interest: http://enobytes.org/wine_blog/2007/05/03/screwcaps-and-bottle-aging/

I tend to agree with Craig that wines will age well under screwcap and there has been some preliminary research on the subject at hand.
July 10, 2008 | Unregistered CommenterEnobytes

PostPost a New Comment

Enter your information below to add a new comment.

My response is on my own website »
Author Email (optional):
Author URL (optional):
Post:
 
All HTML will be escaped. Hyperlinks will be created for URLs automatically.